Rekonstruksi Aksiologi Tafsir Al-Qur’an dalam Menjawab Problem Sosial Kontemporer dan Mewujudkan Kemaslahatan Publik

Nafisah Parwatii; Lisa Dwina  Fitri; La Ode Ismail Ahmad

Authors

Nafisah Parwatii Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
Lisa Dwina Fitri Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
La Ode Ismail Ahmad Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

Keywords:

Axiology of Qur’anic interpretation, philosophy of interpretation, public benefit, social implementation, evaluation of interpretation

Abstract

Qur’anic interpretation has generally placed greater emphasis on ontological and epistemological issues, while its axiological dimension, which concerns the values, purposes, benefits, and social consequences of interpretation, has received comparatively limited attention. This study aims to examine the nature of the axiology of Qur’anic interpretation, identify the values underlying the interpretive process, and formulate an evaluative framework for the implementation of interpretation in social life. The study employs a qualitative library research design using philosophical inquiry and qualitative content analysis. Data were drawn from books and journal articles discussing the philosophy of science, axiology, philosophy of interpretation, maqāṣidī interpretation, contextual approaches, interpretive ethics, and public benefit. The data were analyzed through reduction, thematic categorization, comparison with previous studies, and conceptual synthesis. The findings demonstrate that the axiology of interpretation is not merely a supplementary component of ontology and epistemology, but an ethical orientation that connects methodological validity with the social responsibility of interpretation. Its principal values include monotheism, truth, justice, humanity, public benefit, moderation, responsibility, and scholarly openness. The study also develops a four-dimensional evaluative framework consisting of foundational values, interpretive objectives, social implementation, and the impact of public benefit. This framework constitutes the study’s scientific contribution by transforming axiology from a general normative concept into an analytical instrument for assessing the direction, relevance, and consequences of interpretive products. The findings imply the need to strengthen Qur’anic interpretation that is methodologically sound, contextual, ethical, and responsive to contemporary social problems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akmal, Andi Muhammad, dan Muhammad Ikbal. “Digitalisasi Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir Media Sosial di Indonesia.” Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas 1, no. 1 (2021): 110–114. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v1i1.11552.

Al-Banna, Muhammad Rifat, dan Moch. Ihsan Hilmi. “Analisis atas Respons Netizen pada Postingan Akun @Quranreview di Instagram.” Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas 2, no. 1 (2022): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i1.15770.

Alwi HS, Muhammad, Siti Robikah, dan Iin Parninsih. “Reinterpretation of the Term Al-Nas (QS. Al-Hujurat 13) in Relation to the Social Aspects of Human and Homo Sapiens.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 22, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2021.2202-11.

Bari, Utsmani Abdul. “Ontologi, Epistemologi dan Aksiologi serta Aktualisasinya dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (2025).

Basyir, Djazuli Ruhan. “Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi serta Aktualisasinya dalam Studi Tafsir.” Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Keislaman 8, no. 1 (2024): 117–133.

Fawaid, Ahmad, dan Thoriq Aziz Jayana. “Kategorisasi Tafsir dan Problematikanya dalam Kajian Kontemporer.” Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas 2, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i3.18692.

Haryanto, Heri. “Filsafat Ilmu Tafsir: Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi dalam Studi Islam Kontemporer.” ANWARUL 6, no. 1 (2026): 102–120. https://doi.org/10.58578/anwarul.v6i1.8711.

Husaini, Muhammad Amin. “Reinterpretation of the Term al-Nās (Q.S. al-Ḥujurāt [49]: 13) in the Perspective of Tafsir Maqāṣidī.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/alquran/article/view/2202-11.

Maulidiyah, Indah. “Telaah Perbandingan Metode Tafsir Maqashidi dan Ma‘nā-cum-Maghzā terhadap Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” Moderasi: Journal of Islamic Studies (2022). https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/ushuluddin/moderasi/article/view/3129.

Muzakky, Althaf Husein. “Tafsir Maqāṣidī dan Pengembangan Kisah Al-Qur’an: Studi Kisah Nabi Bermuka Masam dalam Q.S. ‘Abasa [80]: 1–11.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 10, no. 1 (2021): 73–92. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v10i1.18946.

Rifqi, Muhammad Ainur, dan A. Halil Thahir. “Tafsir Maqasidi: Building Interpretation Paradigm Based on Mashlahah.” Millah: Journal of Religious Studies 18, no. 2 (2019): 335–356. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol18.iss2.art7.

Saihu, Made. “Tafsir Maqāṣidī untuk Maqāṣid al-Syarīah.” Al-Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur’an 21, no. 1 (2021): 44–69. https://doi.org/10.53828/alburhan.v21i01.225.

Saleh, Muhammad, Abdul Kadir Riyadi, dan Nafi’ Mubarok. “Tafsir Maqasid dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Hukum: Analisis Tafsir al-Jassas.” Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses 7, no. 2 (2024): 321–340.

Samsir. “Maqashidi Tafsir: An Effort to Unveil the Universal Values of the Qur’an.” Tafasir: Journal of Qur’anic Studies (2024).

Sanityastuti, Marfuah, Rika Lusri Virga, dan Latifa Zahra. “Understanding Digital Literacy in Religious Content on Social Media: @generation_muda_nu and @kuntummagazine Study.” Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi 17, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.14421/pjk.v17i1.3062.

Wahyuni, Mukhammad Hubbab Nauval, Nanda Saputra, dan Panji Isa Bangsawan. “Etika terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Perspektif Tafsir Maqashidi.” Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner 7, no. 2 (2022): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v7i2.1329.