All articles distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Peer Review Process
English Edition
Review System & Policy Statement
All manuscripts submitted to Journal of Qur’an and Hadith undergo a rigorous evaluation process to ensure academic quality, originality, and scholarly contribution. The journal strictly applies a Double-Blind Peer Review system where the identities of both authors and reviewers remain completely concealed throughout the review cycle.
MAX
Plagiarism Threshold 20% Maximum Similarity
TIME
Processing Duration 4 – 8 Weeks Timeline
Review Workflow Phases
01
Phase 1: Initial Desk Review & Screening The editorial board evaluates submitted manuscripts for scope relevance, structural alignment, language compliance, and baseline scholarly rigor. Submissions failing initial requirements face rejection or formatting return.
02
Phase 2: External Peer Evaluation Qualified papers proceed anonymously to at least two external reviewers specializing in Qur'anic or Hadith studies. Reviewers assess original contribution, methodological validity, textual criticism, and argumentation quality.
03
Phase 3: Revision & Secondary Re-Evaluation Authors modify their manuscripts based on peer reviewer recommendations and editorial critiques. Revised versions undergo secondary screening to ensure all raised concerns have been properly addressed.
04
Phase 4: Post-Review Production & Publication Accepted manuscripts officially enter technical production, including professional copyediting, layout typesetting, proofreading validation, and DOI assignment for digital publication.
Edisi Indonesia
Kebijakan Sistem Penelaahan
Seluruh naskah yang dikirimkan ke Journal of Qur’an and Hadith akan melalui proses ulasan mitra bebestari yang ketat demi menjamin mutu akademik, keaslian riset, dan kontribusi ilmiah. Jurnal ini menerapkan sistem Double-Blind Peer Review, di mana identitas penulis dan reviewer dirahasiakan sepenuhnya selama proses review berlangsung.
MAK
Batas Indeks Kesamaan Maksimal 20% Similarity
WKT
Estimasi Durasi Proses Sekitar 4 – 8 Minggu
Alur Tahapan Penelaahan
01
Tahap 1: Evaluasi Awal & Desk Review Dewan editor melakukan seleksi awal terhadap naskah untuk mengukur kesesuaian fokus, kualitas dasar ilmiah, orisinalitas, dan pemenuhan pedoman. Naskah yang tidak memenuhi syarat dasar akan dikembalikan atau ditolak secara langsung.
02
Tahap 2: Penelaahan Mitra Bestari Eksternal Naskah yang lolos seleksi awal dikirim secara anonim kepada minimal dua reviewer ahli. Reviewer menguji kebaruan naskah, ketepatan metodologi, kedalaman analisis tekstual, kontribusi ilmiah, serta validitas rujukan.
03
Tahap 3: Perbaikan & Pemeriksaan Ulang Penulis melakukan perbaikan naskah berlandaskan poin ulasan dari mitra bebestari dan catatan editor. Naskah revisi diperiksa kembali untuk memastikan ketelitian penyempurnaan sebelum dewan editor menetapkan status penerbitan.
04
Tahap 4: Produksi Teknis & Penerbitan Digital Artikel yang dinyatakan diterima secara resmi melaju ke tahap produksi teknis, yang mencakup penyelarasan bahasa (copyediting), tata letak halaman (layout editing), uji baca akhir (proofreading), serta penetapan nomor DOI.
