Konstruksi Model QURANI untuk Penguatan Literasi Al-Qur’an pada Komunitas Pemuda di Era Digital

Indra Wahyudi; Nurdin; Kamriah

Authors

Indra Wahyudi Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone, Indonesia
Nurdin Universitas PTIQ Jakarta, Indonesia
Kamriah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia

Keywords:

Qur’anic literacy, youth community, Qur’anic interpretation, digital literacy, QURANI Model

Abstract

The development of youth-based religious communities indicates a growing interest among young Muslims in engaging with the Qur’an through recitation, reading improvement, memorization, Qur’anic interpretation, reflection, and digital content production. Nevertheless, Qur’anic literacy practices within youth communities remain fragmented because they frequently emphasize reading fluency, memorization targets, or motivational messages without integrating interpretive competence, religious information verification, reflective engagement, and social actualization. This study aims to construct an integrative and transformative Qur’anic literacy model that corresponds to the characteristics of youth communities in the digital age. It employs a qualitative approach through an integrative literature review. Data were collected from academic literature concerning Qur’anic literacy, Qur’anic interpretation, digital literacy, youth education, learning communities, and digital religiosity. The data were examined through conceptual identification, thematic categorization, comparative analysis, and conceptual synthesis. The study formulates the QURANI Model, consisting of six interconnected dimensions: Qirā’ah and Recitation, Understanding and Interpretation, Reflective Tadabbur, Actualization of Values, Navigation of Digital Information, and Interaction and Collaborative Production. These dimensions are implemented through participatory learning, mentoring, social projects, digital content production, and continuous assessment. The model extends Qur’anic literacy beyond technical reading proficiency toward the capacities to understand, verify, reflect upon, actualize, and responsibly communicate Qur’anic teachings. The QURANI Model offers a conceptual framework for designing youth community programs that connect textual competence, interpretive awareness, digital responsibility, spiritual formation, and social transformation. However, its effectiveness needs to be empirically examined across youth communities with diverse social, cultural, and organizational characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Banna, Muhammad Rifat, and Moch. Ihsan Hilmi. “Analisis atas Respon Netizen pada Postingan Akun @Quranreview di Instagram.” Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas 2, no. 1 (2022): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v2i1.15770.

Ashraf, Muhammad A., Mei Yang, Yuhui Zhang, Mouna Denden, Ahmed Tlili, Junfeng Liu, Ronghuai Huang, and Daniel Burgos. “A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management 14 (2021): 1525–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S331741.

Aulia, Muhammad Hizba, Syahidin, M. Nur Faizin, and Muhamad Mauris Faruqi Ali. “Qur’anic Tadabbur Models for Enhancing Students Character and Spiritual Awareness.” Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman 14, no. 1 (2025): 133–56. https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v14i1.1497.

Azzukhruf, Muhammad Wahyudi, and Radino. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Peer Tutors in Qur’an Tahsin Learning.” Kalijaga Journal of Islamic Religious Education 2, no. 1 (2026): 138–57. https://doi.org/10.14421/jire.13633.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bandung. “Statistik Pemuda Indonesia 2024.” May 27, 2025. https://bandungkab.bps.go.id/id/news/2025/05/27/266/statistik-pemuda-indonesia-2024.html.

Bawden, David. “Information and Digital Literacies: A Review of Concepts.” Journal of Documentation 57, no. 2 (2001): 218–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007083.

Freeman, Scott, Sarah L. Eddy, Miles McDonough, Michelle K. Smith, Nnadozie Okoroafor, Hannah Jordt, and Mary Pat Wenderoth. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, no. 23 (2014): 8410–15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

Guo, Pengyue, Nadira Saab, Lysanne S. Post, and Wilfried Admiraal. “A Review of Project-Based Learning in Higher Education: Student Outcomes and Measures.” International Journal of Educational Research 102 (2020): 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.

Hashim, Azmil, Jahidih Saili, and Mohd Aderi Che Noh. “The Relationship between Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Al-Quran Tajweed Performance among Students KKQ in Malaysia.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 (2015): 1530–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.106.

Jamil, Muhammad. “Exploring the Qur’anic Literacy Tradition: A Review of Traditional and Modern Pesantren in Tuban Indonesia.” Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya 9, no. 1 (2024): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v9i1.4670.

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. “Menag: Penyempurnaan Terjemahan Al-Qur’an Bukan Menyalahkan Terjemahan Al-Qur’an Sebelumnya.” July 9, 2019. https://lajnah.kemenag.go.id/info-lpmq/berita-dan-artikel/berita/menag-revisi-terjemahan-al-qur-an-bukan-menyalahkan-terjemahan-al-qur-an-sebelumnya.html.

———. “Qur’an Kemenag: Surah Al-Muzzammil (73) Ayat 4.” Accessed May 25, 2026. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/quran/per-ayat/surah/73?from=4&to=4.

———. “Qur’an Kemenag: Surah An-Naḥl (16) Ayat 43.” Accessed May 25, 2026. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/quran/per-ayat/surah/16?from=43&to=43.

———. “Qur’an Kemenag: Surah Ṣād (38) Ayat 29.” Accessed May 25, 2026. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/quran/per-ayat/surah/38?from=29&to=29.

———. “QS al-Ḥujurāt [49]: 6.” Qur’an Kemenag. Accessed May 25, 2026. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/quran/per-ayat/surah/49?from=6&to=6.

Kolb, David A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.

Komunitas One Day One Juz. “Komunitas One Day One Juz.” Accessed May 25, 2026. https://onedayonejuz.org/.

Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355.

Law, Nancy, David Woo, Jimmy de la Torre, and Gary Wong. A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. Information Paper No. 51. Montréal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2018. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265403.

Mubarok, Muhamad Fajar, and Muhamad Fanji Romdhoni. “Digitalisasi Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir Sosial Media di Indonesia.” Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas 1, no. 1 (2021): 110–14. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v1i1.11552.

Mursalin, Abdul Ghany. “Kajian Metode Tafsir di Media Sosial pada Akun Instagram @Quranreview.” Jurnal Tafsere 11, no. 2 (2023): 34–55. https://doi.org/10.24252/jt.v11i2.42124.

The New London Group. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66, no. 1 (1996): 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.

Pajarianto, Hadi, Imam Pribadi, Muhammad Yusuf, Sulaeman, Puspa Sari, Ming Chou Liu, and Harmita Sari. “Religious Literacy as a Mediator in the Ecosystem Model of Religious Moderation Towards Youth’s Tolerance Attitudes.” International Journal of Law and Society 4, no. 3 (2025): 445–66. https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v4i3.236.

Richtig, Iqomah, and Muhammad Saifullah. “‘Quranreview’: Interaksi Anak Muda Muslim dengan Al-Quran di Era Digital.” SUHUF 15, no. 2 (2022): 267–87. https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v15i2.765.

Sabani, Noraisikin, Glenn Hardaker, Aishah Sabki, and Salmah Salleh. “Understandings of Islamic Pedagogy for Personalised Learning.” The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 33, no. 2 (2016): 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-01-2016-0003.

Setiadi, Dudi, Sri Nurhayati, Ansori, Mohamad Zubaidi, and Rudi Amir. “Youth’s Digital Literacy in the Context of Community Empowerment in an Emerging Society 5.0.” Society 11, no. 1 (2023): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i1.491.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir: Syarat, Ketentuan, dan Aturan yang Patut Anda Ketahui dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2013.

Souto-Otero, Manuel, Daniela Ulicna, Loraine Schaepkens, and Viktoria Bognar. Study on the Impact of Non-Formal Education in Youth Organisations on Young People’s Employability. Brussels: European Youth Forum, 2013. https://www.youthforum.org/files/Study2C20No-Formal20Education.pdf.

Sulistyo, Teguh, Katharina Putri Nur Eltris, Siti Mafulah, Slamet Budianto, Saiful, and Dyah Fajar Heriyawati. “Portfolio Assessment: Learning Outcomes and Students’ Attitudes.” Studies in English Language and Education 7, no. 1 (2020): 141–53. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169.

Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Yudelnilastia, and Widia Agustin. “Kuy Murojaah and Ngafal Ngefeel Communities: A Phenomenological Study of the Quran Community among Generation Z.” Modern Islamic Studies and Sharia Research 1, no. 1 (2025): 70–81. https://doi.org/10.30983/missr.v1i1.10011.