Rasionalisme Tafsir Mu’tazilah: Dari al-Ushul al-Khamsah hingga Relevansinya bagi Hermeneutika al-Qur’an Kontemporer

Authors

  • Mariani Idris Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
  • Halimah Basri Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andi Miswar Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

Keywords:

Mu’tazilah, Qur’anic Exegesis, al-Ushul al-Khamsah, Qur’anic Hermeneutics, Rationalism

Abstract

The Mu’tazilite tradition of Qur’anic exegesis occupies a significant position in Qur’anic studies due to its rational approach, which places reason as a primary instrument for understanding revelation. Amid the growing tendency toward literalist interpretation, Mu’tazilite thought has regained scholarly attention as a model of Islamic hermeneutics emphasizing linguistic analysis, rationality, and divine justice. This study aims to analyze the intellectual genealogy of Mu’tazilite exegesis, examine the epistemological foundations of al-Ushul al-Khamsah, explore their application in interpreting selected theological Qur’anic verses, and assess their relevance to contemporary Qur’anic hermeneutics. This research employs a qualitative library research method with a descriptive approach. Primary data are derived from major Mu’tazilite works, including al-Zamakhshari’s al-Kashshaf, Qadi’Abd al-Jabbar’s Sharh al-Ushul al-Khamsah, al-Mughni, and Tanzih al-Qur’an’an al-Mata’in, while secondary data are obtained from relevant classical and contemporary literature. The data were analyzed using content analysis combined with historical-hermeneutical interpretation. The findings reveal that Mu’tazilite exegesis is grounded in the five theological principles of al-Ushul al-Khamsah, producing a rational, linguistic, and interpretive approach based on ta’wil. This methodology is reflected in the interpretation of Qur’anic verses concerning the divine attributes, guidance and free will, the beatific vision (ru’yat Allah), and the problem of divine causation of misguidance. Although some of its theological doctrines remain controversial, the Mu’tazilite rational-linguistic methodology continues to provide valuable contributions to the development of contextual, critical, and contemporary Qur’anic hermeneutics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. al-Ittijah al- ‘Aqli fi al-Tafsir: Dirasah fi Qadiyyat al-Majaz fi al-Qur ‘an ‘Inda al-Mu‘tazilah. Beirut: Dar al-Tanwir, 1982.

Abu Zayd, Nasr Hamid. Mafhum al-Nass: Dirasah fi ‘Ulum al-Qur ‘an. Beirut: al-Markaz al-Thaqafi al- ‘Arabi, 1994.

Cooperson, Michael. al-Ma ‘mun. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2005.

‘Abd al-Jabbar ibn Ahmad al-Asadabadi, Qadi. al-Mughni fi Abwab al-Tawhid wa al-‘Adl. Diedit oleh Ibrahim Madkur et al. Kairo: al-Dar al-Misriyyah, 1962.

‘Abd al-Jabbar ibn Ahmad al-Asadabadi, Qadi. Sharh al-Ushul al-Khamsah. Diedit oleh ‘Abd al-Karim ‘Uthman. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1965.

‘Abd al-Jabbar ibn Ahmad al-Asadabadi, Qadi. Tanzih al-Qur ‘an ‘an al-Mata ‘in. Beirut: Dar al-Nahdah al-Hadithah, t.t.

al-Dhahabi, Muhammad Husayn. al-Tafsir wa al-Mufassirun. Cet. ke-9. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2000.

al-Hamawi, Yaqut ibn ‘Abdillah. Mu ‘jam al-Udaba ‘. Diedit oleh Ihsan ‘Abbas. Beirut: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami, 1993.

al-Murtada, Ibn (Ahmad ibn Yahya). Tabaqat al-Mu‘tazilah. Diedit oleh Susanna Diwald-Wilzer. Beirut: Dar Maktabah al-Hayah, 1961.

al-Muhtasib, ‘Abd al-Majid ‘Abd al-Salam. Ittijahat al-Tafsir fi al- ‘Asr al-Rahin. Amman: Dar al-Fikr, 1982.

al-Shahrastani, Abu al-Fath Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Karim. al-Milal wa al-Nihal. Diedit oleh Muhammad Sayyid Kaylani. Beirut: Dar al-Ma ‘rifah, 1404 H.

al-Zamakhshari, Mahmud ibn ‘Umar. al-Kashshaf ‘an Haqa ‘iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil. Diedit oleh Khalil Ma ‘mun Shiha. Beirut: Dar al-Ma ‘rifah, 2009.

Ibn Katsir, Isma ‘il ibn ‘Umar. Tafsir al-Qur ‘an al- ‘Azhim. Diedit oleh Sami ibn Muhammad Salamah. Riyadh: Dar Taybah, 1999.

Ibn Khallikan, Ahmad ibn Muhammad. Wafayat al-A ‘yan. Diedit oleh Ihsan ‘Abbas. Beirut: Dar Shadir, 1971.

Madjid, Nurcholish. Islam Doktrin dan Peradaban. Jakarta: Paramadina, 1992.

Martin, Richard C., Mark R. Woodward, dan Dwi S. Atmaja. Defenders of Reason in Islam: Mu ‘tazilism from Medieval School to Modern Symbol. Oxford: Oneworld, 1997.

Nasution, Harun. Teologi Islam: Aliran-Aliran Sejarah Analisa Perbandingan. Cet. ke-5. Jakarta: UI-Press, 1986.

Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian al-Qur ‘an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Tajfel, Henri dan John C. Turner. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Dalam The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, diedit oleh William G. Austin dan Stephen Worchel, 33-47. Monterey: Brooks/Cole, 1979.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Idris, Mariani, Halimah Basri, and Andi Miswar. 2026. “Rasionalisme Tafsir Mu’tazilah: Dari Al-Ushul Al-Khamsah Hingga Relevansinya Bagi Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Kontemporer”. Journal of Qur’an and Hadith 1 (1): 49-61. https://journal.saorajahadisinstitute.org/index.php/jqh/article/view/9.