ADDITIONAL MENU
PEOPLE
JOURNAL POLICY
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS
MANUSCRIPT TEMPLATE
RESEARCH & SCHOLARLY TOOLS
INDEXING & ABSTRACTING
ISSN & IDENTIFIER
VISITOR METRICS
International Readers & Visitors:
CALL FOR PAPERS
Jurnal Hadis Indonesia
IDMetode Review Double-Blind Peer Review
ENReview Method Double-Blind Peer Review
IDRata-rata Durasi 3 - 6 Minggu
ENAverage Duration 3 - 6 Weeks
IDSemua naskah yang dikirimkan ke Jurnal Hadis Indonesia menjalani proses penelaahan sejawat secara objektif dan independen menggunakan metode Double-Blind Peer Review. Penulis dan mitra bebestari (reviewer) saling tidak mengetahui identitas masing-masing untuk menjamin kerahasiaan, keadilan, serta kualitas akademik naskah yang diterbitkan.
ENAll manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Hadis Indonesia undergo an objective and independent peer review process using the Double-Blind Peer Review method. Authors and reviewers do not know each other's identities to ensure confidentiality, fairness, and the academic quality of the published manuscripts.
Tahapan Penelaahan Naskah
Review Workflow
1
Pemeriksaan Awal Editor (Submission & Initial Screening)
IDNaskah yang masuk diperiksa oleh Editor Awal terkait keselarasan dengan Focus & Scope, kepatuhan pada Author Guidelines, kelengkapan administrasi, serta pemeriksaan plagiarisme/kemiripan teks (maksimal 20% via Turnitin).
ENSubmitted manuscripts are checked by the Initial Editor regarding alignment with the Focus & Scope, compliance with Author Guidelines, administrative completeness, and plagiarism/text similarity check (maximum 20% via Turnitin).
2
Penelaahan Mitra Bebestari (Double-Blind Peer Review)
IDNaskah yang lolos seleksi awal dikirim secara anonim kepada sekurang-kurangnya 2 (dua) orang Mitra Bebestari pakar di bidangnya. Reviewer menilai aspek kebaruan (novelty), keabsahan metodologi, kedalaman pembahasan, dan kontribusi ilmiah.
ENManuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent anonymously to at least 2 (two) expert Reviewers in their field. Reviewers assess novelty, methodological validity, depth of discussion, and scientific contribution.
3
Keputusan Dewan Redaksi (Editorial Decision)
IDBerdasarkan rekomendasi reviewer, Editor-in-Chief mengambil keputusan: Accept Submission, Revisions Required (Minor/Major), Resubmit for Review, atau Decline Submission.
ENBased on reviewer recommendations, the Editor-in-Chief makes a decision: Accept Submission, Revisions Required (Minor/Major), Resubmit for Review, or Decline Submission.
4
Revisi Penulis (Author Revision & Verification)
IDPenulis memperbaiki naskah sesuai catatan revisi reviewer dan menyertakan matrik tanggapan (response to reviewers) dalam batas waktu yang ditentukan. Editor melakukan pemeriksaan kembali.
ENAuthors revise the manuscript according to reviewer notes and include a response matrix (response to reviewers) within the specified timeframe. The Editor re-verifies the revised manuscript.
5
Penerbitan (Final Copyediting, Layout & Publishing)
IDNaskah yang telah diterima secara final melewati tahap penyuntingan kebahasaan (copyediting), tata letak PDF (layout editing), pemeriksaan bukti cetak (proofreading), hingga dipublikasikan secara Open Access.
ENFinally accepted manuscripts undergo language copyediting, PDF layout editing, print proofreading, until they are published in Open Access.
IDKomitmen kami pada proses penelaahan sejawat yang ketat merupakan jaminan kredibilitas ilmiah Jurnal Hadis Indonesia. Keputusan akhir atas penerbitan naskah bersifat independen dan sepenuhnya berada di bawah wewenang Dewan Redaksi berdasarkan rekomendasi ilmiah para reviewer.
ENOur commitment to a rigorous peer review process is a guarantee of the scientific credibility of Jurnal Hadis Indonesia. The final decision on manuscript publication is independent and lies entirely under the authority of the Editorial Board based on the scientific recommendations of the reviewers.
