Jurnal Hadis Indonesia

Reviewer Guidelines

Quality Control Standard

IDMetode Evaluasi Double-Blind Peer Review

ENEvaluation Method Double-Blind Peer Review

IDAlokasi Waktu Review 3 – 6 Minggu (Fleksibel)

ENReview Time Allocation 3 – 6 Weeks (Flexible)

IDMitra Bebestari (Reviewer) memainkan peran fundamental dalam menjaga kredibilitas dan keunggulan akademik Jurnal Hadis Indonesia. Proses penelaahan (peer review) kami berlandaskan prinsip objektivitas dan kerahasiaan (Double-Blind). Kami sangat menghargai kontribusi waktu dan kepakaran Anda dalam memberikan penilaian kritis yang konstruktif guna memajukan literatur keislaman, khususnya dalam bidang keilmuan Hadis.

ENPeer Reviewers play a fundamental role in maintaining the credibility and academic excellence of Jurnal Hadis Indonesia. Our peer review process is based on the principles of objectivity and confidentiality (Double-Blind). We greatly appreciate your contribution of time and expertise in providing constructive critical assessments to advance Islamic literature, particularly in the field of Hadith studies.

Tanggung Jawab Etik Mitra Bebestari

Reviewers' Ethical Responsibilities

1. Kerahasiaan Dokumen

Document Confidentiality

CONFIDENTIALITY

IDNaskah ulasan adalah dokumen rahasia. Reviewer tidak diperkenankan membagikan atau menggunakan data naskah untuk kepentingan pribadi sebelum terbit resmi.

ENReviewed manuscripts are confidential documents. Reviewers are not permitted to share or use manuscript data for personal purposes before official publication.

2. Objektivitas Penilaian

Assessment Objectivity

OBJECTIVITY

IDEvaluasi dilakukan secara netral berdasar argumen akademik. Dilarang memberikan kritik personal. Masukan wajib bersifat membangun (constructive feedback).

ENEvaluations are conducted neutrally based on academic arguments. Personal criticism is prohibited. Feedback must be constructive.

3. Benturan Kepentingan

Conflict of Interest

NO CONFLICT

IDReviewer wajib menolak penelaahan jika mengenali identitas penulis atau memiliki benturan kepentingan finansial maupun relasi institusional.

ENReviewers must decline the review if they recognize the author's identity or have financial or institutional relationship conflicts of interest.

4. Ketepatan Waktu

Promptness

PROMPTNESS

IDJika merasa tidak ahli pada topik naskah atau tidak dapat menyelesaikannya dalam waktu 3-6 minggu, harap segera informasikan ke Dewan Editor.

ENIf you feel unqualified on the manuscript's topic or cannot complete it within 3-6 weeks, please immediately inform the Editorial Board.

Fokus Evaluasi & Penilaian Substansi Naskah

Evaluation Focus & Manuscript Substance Assessment

1. Kebaruan & Orisinalitas (Novelty)

Apakah artikel menawarkan gagasan segar atau pendekatan baru? Tinjau apakah bagian pendahuluan menguraikan state of the art dan kesenjangan riset dengan jelas.

1. Novelty & Originality

Does the article offer fresh ideas or a new approach? Review whether the introduction clearly outlines the state of the art and research gaps.

2. Keabsahan Metodologi (Methodological Rigor)

Nilai kesesuaian metode takhrij, pisau analisis hermeneutika, atau pendekatan sosial. Pastikan penulis menerapkan kaidah keilmuan secara logis.

2. Methodological Rigor

Assess the suitability of the takhrij method, hermeneutical analysis, or social approach. Ensure authors apply scientific principles logically.

3. Kualitas Data & Argumentasi

Periksa apakah argumentasi didukung data (matan/sanad) yang sahih dan relevan, serta kesimpulan dirumuskan berdasar paparan data, bukan spekulasi.

3. Data Quality & Argumentation

Check if arguments are supported by valid data (matan/sanad), and conclusions are formulated based on the presented data, not speculation.

4. Pustaka & Sitasi Kutipan

Pastikan rujukan mutakhir. Reviewer dapat merekomendasikan literatur relevan, namun dilarang memaksa penulis menyitasi karya reviewer (Coercive Citation).

4. References & Citations

Ensure references are up-to-date. Reviewers may recommend relevant literature, but forcing authors to cite the reviewer's work (Coercive Citation) is prohibited.

Kategori Rekomendasi Penelaahan

Reviewer Recommendation Categories

Accept Submission IDNaskah sangat berkualitas dan dapat diterbitkan langsung tanpa perlu perbaikan tambahan. ENHigh-quality manuscript that can be published directly without additional revisions.

Revisions Required IDNaskah berpotensi baik, namun butuh perbaikan (Minor/Mayor) pada argumen atau metode. ENGood potential, but needs revisions (Minor/Major) on arguments or methodology.

Decline Submission IDNaskah ditolak karena di luar scope, cacat metode fatal, atau tingkat plagiarisme tinggi. ENRejected due to out of scope, fatal method flaws, or high plagiarism rates.

Larangan Penggunaan AI dalam Proses Review

Untuk mematuhi kebijakan privasi penulis dan keamanan data (selaras dengan panduan COPE), Mitra Bebestari dilarang keras mengunggah naskah penulis ke dalam platform AI generatif (seperti ChatGPT, Claude) guna membuat ringkasan atau merumuskan evaluasi. Kepakaran dan analisis kritis manusia Anda adalah komponen yang tidak tergantikan.

Prohibition of AI Use in the Review Process

To comply with author privacy and data security policies (aligned with COPE guidelines), Peer Reviewers are strictly prohibited from uploading authors' manuscripts into generative AI platforms (such as ChatGPT, Claude) to summarize or formulate evaluations. Your human expertise and critical analysis are irreplaceable components.

IDSeluruh alur komunikasi, penugasan, dan pengunggahan formulir evaluasi dilakukan terpusat melalui sistem daring kami. Untuk mengakses penugasan ulasan Anda, silakan masuk ke portal Login OJS JHI.

ENAll communication flows, assignments, and evaluation form uploads are conducted centrally through our online system. To access your review assignments, please log in to the JHI OJS Login portal.